2024: What’s the Worst That Could Happen?

Every January, CFR’s annual Preventive Priorities Survey analyzes the conflicts most likely to occur in the year ahead and measures their potential impact. For the first time, the survey anticipates that this year, 2024, the United States will contend not only with a slew of global threats, but also a high risk of upheaval within its own borders. Is the country prepared for the eruption of election-related instability at home while wars continue to rage abroad?

Play Button Pause Button
0:00 0:00
x
Host
  • Gabrielle Sierra
    Director, Podcasting
Credits

Asher Ross - Supervising Producer

Markus Zakaria - Audio Producer and Sound Designer

Molly McAnany - Associate Podcast Producer

Episode Guests
  • Paul B. Stares
    General John W. Vessey Senior Fellow for Conflict Prevention and Director of the Center for Preventive Action

Show Notes

For the first time in its sixteen-year history, CFR’s annual Preventive Priorities Survey found that the leading concern among foreign policy experts lies within U.S. borders: the possibility of domestic terrorism and political violence in the wake of the 2024 U.S. presidential election. 

 

Among the thirty other threats deemed plausible by experts were a wider regional conflict in the Middle East borne out of the war in the Gaza Strip and a mass migration crisis on the southwest U.S. border. An escalation in the war between Russia and Ukraine, a military conflict between China and Taiwan, and a highly disruptive cyberattack on U.S. critical infrastructure all present serious economic and national security risks as well.

 

 

 

Whether or not these threats come to a head in 2024 depends on how global leaders navigate growing tensions both at home and abroad.

 

Read the full 2024 Preventive Priorities Survey

 

Check out the Center for Preventive Action’s Global Conflict Tracker.

 

 

From CFR

 

Will Freeman, ”Tough New Immigration Rules Risk Empowering the Cartels,” TIME

 

Will Merrow and Kali Robinson, “Iran’s Regional Armed Network

 

David Sacks, “Why Is Taiwan Important to the United States?

 

Jacob Ware, “The Southern Border Poses Terrorism Risks. Homegrown Threats Still Loom Larger

 

From Our Guest

 

Averting Major Power War: The Logic of Mutual Assured Survival

 

In This Turbulent Year, Peace Has to Start at Home for the United States,” The Hill

 

Read More

 

Bruce Hoffman and Jacob Ware, “God, Guns, and Sedition: Far-Right Terrorism in America

 

Ten Conflicts to Watch in 2024,” International Crisis Group

 

Watch and Listen

 

What to Worry About in 2024,” CFR.org 


Israel-Hamas War: Regional Ripple Effects,” CFR.org

Trade

Global trade tensions are boiling over and questions about the United States’ economic future are at the center of the debate. As trade experts question what comes next, it’s important to analyze how the United States got to this point. How have the current administration’s trade policies of today reshaped the global order of tomorrow?

U.S. Trade Deficit

The United States has had a trade deficit, meaning we import more than we export, for the past fifty years. But recently the trade deficit has become a front-burner issue for President Donald Trump and a core reason for his administration’s sweeping tariff policy. When do trade deficits become a problem? Is the United States already at the tipping point?

Trade

With allies and adversaries alike impacted by new economic barriers and tariffs, the global map of U.S. trade relationships hangs in question. As the U.S. rethinks its commitments with its trading partners, allies may seek deals elsewhere, even with historic rivals. Can the president single-handedly tear up a trade deal, and what happens when deals that took decades to craft are suddenly up for renegotiation?

Top Stories on CFR

Climate Change

The legislation promoted by Trump and the White House will undo many of the climate and energy initiatives and tax credit programs passed during the Joe Biden administration.

Iran

Countries without nuclear weapons could decide nuclear nonproliferation and transparency efforts that the world has taken for granted now pose more risk than reward.

Ukraine

President Donald Trump is right to pursue diplomacy in Ukraine, but success requires a dual approach. To deliver on his promise to end the Russia-Ukraine war, Trump will need to offer Russia sticks as well as carrots.